Sessions > Session F

Session F.

Educating about the World, Learning from it: Construction and Reception of Knowledge about Global Space

Co-chairs: Anne-Cécile OTT, Nolwenn Azilis RIGOLLET & Romain LECONTE (Géographie-cités)

The World is a geographical object, a scale, a space produced by globalisation, and perhaps even a territory (Didelon, 2013; Reghezza, 2015); it is a category of analysis, particularly for geographers, but it is also a category of action for individuals. Generally considered as the highest level of geographical scale –not to mention of political and social thinking (Grataloup, 2011)–, the World is an object of knowledge and thus of learning. Whether we are talking about global issues, questions of Otherness (strange, far-off lands), or about projecting ourselves at the international and global levels (along with the spatial practices this implies), the World is something that must be learned.

The aim is thus to examine the role played in this learning process by the various entities that disseminate representations of the World. While schools provide representations that have a strong impact on the way people perceive the World (Clerc, 2002; Rigollet, 2022; Ott, 2020), the process of learning about the World also takes place outside of school, in particular through the ever-increasing access provided by the Internet and social networks (Cicchelli & Octobre, 2017). The media, through its international coverage for example (Grasland et al., 2016), creates images of the World and even helps to create a “collective stock of public spaces” (Beauguitte et al., 2016). The economic and political actors (UN, World Bank, NGOs, transnational firms, etc.) at the heart of the process of globalisation also produce a multitude of representations of the World, which reflect the fact that this entity is the product of specific geographical, historical, social, as well as political determinants. How do these institutional representations interact with more vernacular representations of the World? Do the different ways of (re)presenting global space converge or compete? This session aims to explore the ways in which knowledge about global space is constructed, disseminated and received, and to analyse the various ways in which individuals are taught to relate to the World.

Selected Bibliographical References

Beauguitte L., Grasland C., Severo M., 2016, “Espaces géographiques et représentations médiatiques”, L’Espace géographique, 45(1), p. 1-4.
Cicchelli V., Octobre S., 2017, L’amateur cosmopolite. Goûts et imaginaires culturels juvéniles à l’ère de la globalisation, Paris, ministère de la Culture et de la Communication / DEPS, “Questions de culture” series.
Clerc P., 2002, La culture scolaire en géographie. Le monde dans la classe, Rennes, PUR.
Didelon C., 2013, Le Monde comme territoire ; pour une approche renouvelée du Monde en géographie, PhD Thesis, Université de Rouen.
Grasland C., Lamarche-Perrin R., Loveluck B., Pecout H., 2016, “L’agenda géomédiatique international : analyse multidimensionnelle des flux d’actualité”, L’Espace géographique, 45(1), p. 25-43.
Grataloup C., 2011, Faut-il penser autrement l’histoire du monde ?, Paris, Armand Colin, “Éléments de réponse” series.
Ott A.-C., 2020, “Explorer le monde des enfants. Défis théoriques et méthodologiques de l’analyse des représentations enfantines du monde”, Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 146(1), p. 56-80.
Reghezza M., 2015, De l’avènement du Monde à celui de la planète : le basculement de la société du risque à la société de l’incertitude, HDR Dissertation, unpublished volume, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Rigollet N.A., 2022, “Le Monde c’est nous”. L’avènement du Monde au prisme des représentations de l’espace mondial chez les lycéens, PhD Thesis, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

Online user: 1 RSS Feed | Privacy
Loading...